Stores the "why" behind changes
Create a high-context repository where AI agents don't just read your code — they read the minds of previous developers and agents who worked on it.
While Git tells you who changed code and when, Lore tells you why.
Brief description of what you were trying to accomplish
Full chain-of-thought, which can be thousands of words
What you tried but didn't work (and why)
Categorization for easy searching
All entries are cryptographically linked to file content hashes and optionally to Git commits.
| Feature | Comments | Commit Messages | Lore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume | Must be short | ~50 chars | Unlimited (5000+ words) |
| Searchable | Code only | Messages only | Full reasoning + alternatives |
| Stability | Often deleted | Can be amended | Immutable, hash-linked |
| Context | What the code does | What changed | Why it was written that way |
When multiple developers work on different branches, Lore preserves all reasoning using append-only merges
Traditional merge conflict:
Branch A: "Refactored JWT validation"
Branch B: "Optimized token caching"
→ Choose one, lose the other ✗
Loss of context and decision history
Append-only merge strategy:
Branch A: "Refactored JWT validation"
Branch B: "Optimized token caching"
→ Keep both entries ✓
Complete decision history preserved
No manual merge resolution needed—automatic append-only strategy
Both branches' reasoning preserved together, no context lost
View complete decision history with lore explain --all
# After merging two branches with conflicting reasoning
$ lore explain src/auth.rs --all
Agent: claude-code (feature/auth) │ 2026-01-14 10:00:00 UTC
Intent: Refactored JWT validation for security hardening
Agent: claude-code (feature/perf) │ 2026-01-14 11:30:00 UTC
Intent: Optimized token validation caching
# Both perspectives visible—complete context preserved!
Pre-built binaries are available for Linux, macOS, and Windows
# x86_64
sudo curl -L https://github.com/avraammavridis/lore/releases/latest/download/lore-linux-x86_64 -o /usr/local/bin/lore && sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/lore
# ARM64
sudo curl -L https://github.com/avraammavridis/lore/releases/latest/download/lore-linux-aarch64 -o /usr/local/bin/lore && sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/lore
# Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3)
sudo curl -L https://github.com/avraammavridis/lore/releases/latest/download/lore-macos-aarch64 -o /usr/local/bin/lore && sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/lore
# Intel
sudo curl -L https://github.com/avraammavridis/lore/releases/latest/download/lore-macos-x86_64 -o /usr/local/bin/lore && sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/lore
Download the executable:
Download lore.exeOr use PowerShell (run as Administrator):
iwr "https://github.com/avraammavridis/lore/releases/latest/download/lore-windows-x86_64.exe" -OutFile "$env:ProgramFiles\lore.exe"
Lore is designed to work seamlessly with AI coding assistants. Add context that persists across sessions.
Each agent's reasoning is preserved forever
Rejected alternatives prevent re-exploring dead ends
Future agents know why code exists, not just what it does
Query reasoning across the entire project history
Add to your agent's system instructions:
You have access to a tool called `lore`.
Before you edit a file, run `lore explain <file>` to understand the hidden context.
After you finish a task, run `lore record` to save your chain-of-thought
so future agents understand your decisions.
Configure Claude Code to automatically use Lore for every code change
lore init --agent "claude-code"
This file instructs Claude Code to use Lore automatically:
# Lore Integration
This project uses Lore to track reasoning behind code changes. Lore creates a
"high-context" repository where you can understand not just what the code does,
but *why* it was written that way.
## Before Editing Files
Before modifying any file, check if there's existing reasoning context:
lore explain <file-path>
This will show you:
- Why the code was written this way
- What alternatives were considered and rejected
- Any warnings or notes from previous developers/agents
## After Making Changes
After completing any code change, you MUST record your reasoning:
lore record -f <changed-file> \
-m "Brief description of what you did" \
--trace "Your full reasoning and chain-of-thought explaining:
- Why you made these specific changes
- What alternatives you considered
- Any trade-offs or concerns
- Warnings for future developers" \
-r "Alternative 1 you rejected" \
-r "Alternative 2 you rejected" \
-T relevant-tag
## Important Guidelines
1. Always run `lore explain` before editing unfamiliar code
2. Always run `lore record` after completing changes
3. Include rejected alternatives - helps future agents avoid dead ends
4. Add warnings about fragile code
5. Be verbose in reasoning traces - more context is always better
Include these examples in your CLAUDE.md to help agents understand the expected format:
lore record -f src/worker.py \
-m "Fixed race condition in job processing" \
--trace "The worker was occasionally processing the same job twice because
the job status check and status update weren't atomic. I added a Redis-based
distributed lock using the SETNX command with a 30-second TTL.
I chose 30 seconds because our longest job takes ~20 seconds, giving a 50% buffer.
Warning: If Redis is unavailable, jobs will fail rather than risk duplicates.
This is intentional - duplicate processing causes billing issues." \
-r "Database row-level locking (too slow, 100ms+ latency)" \
-r "In-memory lock (doesn't work across multiple workers)" \
-T bugfix -T concurrency -T redis
lore record -f src/api/users.py -f src/models/user.py \
-m "Added user export endpoint for GDPR compliance" \
--trace "Added GET /api/users/{id}/export endpoint that returns all user data
in JSON format. This is required for GDPR Article 20 (right to data portability).
The endpoint:
1. Requires authentication and user can only export their own data
2. Includes rate limiting (1 request per hour) to prevent abuse
3. Streams large responses to avoid memory issues
Note: We intentionally exclude the 'internal_notes' field from exports as legal
confirmed this is not considered user data under GDPR." \
-r "CSV format (JSON is more portable and preserves data types)" \
-r "Background job with email (adds complexity, users want immediate download)" \
-T feature -T gdpr -T api
lore record -f src/billing/calculator.py \
-m "Refactored billing calculator to use strategy pattern" \
--trace "The billing calculator had grown to 800+ lines with deeply nested
if/else chains for different pricing tiers. I refactored to use the strategy pattern:
- Created PricingStrategy abstract base class
- Implemented FreeTier, ProTier, EnterpriseTier strategies
- Calculator now delegates to the appropriate strategy
This reduces the main class from 800 to 150 lines.
IMPORTANT: The old calculate_legacy() method is kept for billing runs before
2024-01-01. Do not remove it until we've migrated all historical invoices.
See ticket BILL-1234 for migration timeline." \
-r "Simple function extraction (doesn't solve the core complexity)" \
-r "Configuration-driven pricing (not flexible enough for enterprise deals)" \
-T refactoring -T billing -T design-pattern
All Claude Code sessions will now automatically use Lore
Configure Cursor to use Lore for persistent reasoning context
lore init --agent "cursor"
Add these instructions to configure Cursor's AI:
# Lore Integration
This project uses Lore to track reasoning behind code changes. Lore creates a
"high-context" repository where you can understand not just what the code does,
but *why* it was written that way.
## Before Editing Files
Before modifying any file, check if there's existing reasoning context:
lore explain <file-path>
This will show you:
- Why the code was written this way
- What alternatives were considered and rejected
- Any warnings or notes from previous developers/agents
## After Making Changes
After completing any code change, you MUST record your reasoning:
lore record -f <changed-file> \
-m "Brief description of what you did" \
--trace "Your full reasoning and chain-of-thought explaining:
- Why you made these specific changes
- What alternatives you considered
- Any trade-offs or concerns
- Warnings for future developers" \
-r "Alternative 1 you rejected" \
-r "Alternative 2 you rejected" \
-T relevant-tag
## Important Guidelines
1. Always run `lore explain` before editing unfamiliar code
2. Always run `lore record` after completing changes
3. Include rejected alternatives - helps future agents avoid dead ends
4. Add warnings about fragile code
5. Be verbose in reasoning traces - more context is always better
Include these examples in your .cursorrules to help agents understand the expected format:
lore record -f src/worker.py \
-m "Fixed race condition in job processing" \
--trace "The worker was occasionally processing the same job twice because
the job status check and status update weren't atomic. I added a Redis-based
distributed lock using the SETNX command with a 30-second TTL.
I chose 30 seconds because our longest job takes ~20 seconds, giving a 50% buffer.
Warning: If Redis is unavailable, jobs will fail rather than risk duplicates.
This is intentional - duplicate processing causes billing issues." \
-r "Database row-level locking (too slow, 100ms+ latency)" \
-r "In-memory lock (doesn't work across multiple workers)" \
-T bugfix -T concurrency -T redis
lore record -f src/api/users.py -f src/models/user.py \
-m "Added user export endpoint for GDPR compliance" \
--trace "Added GET /api/users/{id}/export endpoint that returns all user data
in JSON format. This is required for GDPR Article 20 (right to data portability).
The endpoint:
1. Requires authentication and user can only export their own data
2. Includes rate limiting (1 request per hour) to prevent abuse
3. Streams large responses to avoid memory issues
Note: We intentionally exclude the 'internal_notes' field from exports as legal
confirmed this is not considered user data under GDPR." \
-r "CSV format (JSON is more portable and preserves data types)" \
-r "Background job with email (adds complexity, users want immediate download)" \
-T feature -T gdpr -T api
lore record -f src/billing/calculator.py \
-m "Refactored billing calculator to use strategy pattern" \
--trace "The billing calculator had grown to 800+ lines with deeply nested
if/else chains for different pricing tiers. I refactored to use the strategy pattern:
- Created PricingStrategy abstract base class
- Implemented FreeTier, ProTier, EnterpriseTier strategies
- Calculator now delegates to the appropriate strategy
This reduces the main class from 800 to 150 lines.
IMPORTANT: The old calculate_legacy() method is kept for billing runs before
2024-01-01. Do not remove it until we've migrated all historical invoices.
See ticket BILL-1234 for migration timeline." \
-r "Simple function extraction (doesn't solve the core complexity)" \
-r "Configuration-driven pricing (not flexible enough for enterprise deals)" \
-T refactoring -T billing -T design-pattern
Add to Cursor's "Rules for AI" in Settings > General > Rules for AI:
When working on code:
1. Before editing any file, run 'lore explain <file>' to check for existing context
2. After making changes, run 'lore record' with your reasoning
3. Include rejected alternatives with -r flag
4. Add relevant tags with -T flag
You can also use Lore directly from the command line
lore init --agent "my-agent-id"
lore record -m "Refactoring auth to handle JWTs" \
--trace "I initially tried using library X, but it conflicted..."
lore explain src/auth_middleware.py
lore search "JWT"
lore search "pandas" # Find all code avoiding pandas
Initialize a new Lore repository
lore init --agent "my-agent-id"
Record reasoning for code changes
lore record -m "Intent" --trace "..."
Retrieve reasoning behind a file
lore explain src/auth.py --all
Search through reasoning history
lore search "JWT" --file auth
List all recorded entries
lore list --limit 20 --json
Show Lore status for the repo
lore status
Lore stores data in .lore/ folder (intended to be committed to Git)
.lore/
├── config.json # Repository configuration
├── index.json # File → entry ID mappings
├── entries/ # Individual thought objects
│ ├── uuid1.json
│ ├── uuid2.json
│ └── ...
└── .gitignore # Ignores temp files
{
"id": "550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000",
"target_file": "src/auth_middleware.py",
"line_range": [10, 45],
"file_hash": "sha256:...",
"commit_hash": "a1b2c3d4...",
"agent_id": "claude-3-5-sonnet",
"timestamp": "2024-02-14T10:00:00Z",
"intent": "Refactoring auth to handle JWTs",
"reasoning_trace": "I initially tried using library X...",
"rejected_alternatives": [
{"name": "Auth0 SDK", "reason": "Dependency conflicts"}
],
"tags": ["auth", "security"]
}